Original Research

South African speech-language therapists’ opinion of their training in cleft lip and palate and craniofacial deformities

Emad Ghabrial, Kurt W. Bütow, Steve Olorunju
South African Journal of Communication Disorders | Vol 67, No 1 | a695 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.695 | © 2020 Emad Ghabrial, Kurt W. Bütow, Steve A.S. Olorunju | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 November 2019 | Published: 30 July 2020

About the author(s)

Emad Ghabrial, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Kurt W. Bütow, Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Steve Olorunju, Biostatistics Unit South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Speech care of cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) and craniofacial deformities (CFD) is complex and lengthy and requires collaboration amongst different disciplines. Consequently, it is important to provide academic educational models that include didactics, online learning and clinical exposure in CLP and CFD treatment, and participation in established cleft palate multidisciplinary team management.

Objectives: To obtain information regarding: (1) the perceived adequacy of CLP and CFD academic education of speech-language therapists (SLTs); (2) the professional services that SLTs offer to CLP and CFD patients; and (3) the educational needs of SLTs in this field.

Method: A 54-item online survey to collect quantitative data was conducted by telephone and email using a randomised sample of SLTs in different areas of South Africa.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 123 SLTs, 70% of whom had more than 10 years of professional experience. Of the respondents, 81% acknowledged their limited clinical exposure during their academic education. Only 42% of the professionals offer treatment for CLP and CFD patients. Of the respondents, 96% agreed on the need to improve CLP and CFD academic education, and the majority recommended certified courses, continued-education workshops and online resources.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that SLTs academic training is perceived to be significantly limited in the cleft palate and craniofacial fields. Thus, there is a strong need at the undergraduate level for clinical training and exposure to multidisciplinary management. At post-graduate level there is a need to establish an educational strategy to meet the needs of SLTs providing CLP and CFD care. Participants suggested that programmes for continuing professional education, degree courses and online resources be designed to provide practising clinicians with updated information and guidance in management of CLP and CFD patients.


Keywords

speech-language therapist; cleft palate; cleft lip; multidisciplinary; education; professional development; medical survey; craniofacial disorder.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5216
Total article views: 2559


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.