Original Research

Methodological Issues in the Calculation of Mean Length of Utterance (MLU)

Helena Oosthuizen, Frenette Southwood
South African Journal of Communication Disorders | Vol 56, No 1 | a194 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v56i1.194 | © 2019 Helena Oosthuizen, Frenette Southwood | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 October 2016 | Published: 31 December 2009

About the author(s)

Helena Oosthuizen, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Frenette Southwood, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (349KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Mean length of utterance (MLU) is widely used as a diagnostic, monitoring and group matching measure. This study investigated methodological issues regarding the calculation of MLU. The aim was to establish whether different calculation procedures render different MLUs, and whether there is a high correlation between MLU measured in words (MLU-w) and in morphemes (MLU-m). Language samples from 15 Afrikaans-speaking 6-year-olds with and 15 without specific language impairment were analyzed. MLU was calculated eight times for each participant, varying sample size (50 or 100 utterances), unit counted (words or morphemes) and calculation method (traditional or alternate). Significant differences in resultant MLUs were due to the calculation method used, rather than sample size or unit counted. A high positive correlation (>0.96) between MLU-w and MLU-m was found. The results imply that researchers and clinicians should clearly state their MLU calculation procedures, otherwise reliable comparisons between MLU scores from different sources cannot be made. The results furthermore imply that, in order to generalize research results and make diagnostic decisions based on MLU, consistent procedures should be used, not only with regard to language sampling, but also to MLU calculation.

Keywords

MLU calculation; MLU-w; MLU-m; Afrikaans; SLI

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1444
Total article views: 605

 

Crossref Citations

1. Using General Language Performance Measures to Assess Grammar Learning
Sarita L. Eisenberg
Topics in Language Disorders  vol: 40  issue: 2  first page: 135  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000214