Opinion Paper

From compliance to innovation: Reframing occupational noise-induced hearing loss prevention in Africa through health equity and the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Katijah Khoza-Shangase
South African Journal of Communication Disorders | Vol 73, No 1 | a1182 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v73i1.1182 | © 2026 Katijah Khoza-Shangase | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 March 2026 | Published: 15 September 2026

About the author(s)

Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Department of Audiology, Faculty of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, South Africa

Abstract

Occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) remains an insufficiently addressed public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite occupational health and safety regulations and Hearing Conservation programmes (HCPs), prevention remains compliance-driven and unevenly implemented. Global evidence indicates increasing hearing loss, with sub-Saharan Africa facing compounded risks from occupational noise, infectious diseases and socio-economic inequities. This opinion paper advocates innovation-led, equity-driven ONIHL prevention integrating Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies within hearing conservation systems. The article critically reflects on current occupational hearing conservation approaches and examines tele-audiology, mobile health (mHealth), artificial intelligence (AI), predictive analytics, Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled monitoring and big data as tools for strengthening prevention. Existing HCPs have strengthened occupational surveillance and regulatory awareness, but gaps remain in predictive risk monitoring, continuity of care, multi-hazard integration and inclusion of informal and underserved populations. Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies could decentralise services, strengthen exposure surveillance and early risk identification and expand access. They should augment, rather than replace, existing HCPs. Implementation must account for inconsistent connectivity, limited device access and variable digital literacy. Hybrid digital, community-based and workplace-supported models may therefore be more feasible. Ethical governance, digital sovereignty, trade union engagement and policy reform are central to equitable implementation.
Conclusion: Repositioning ONIHL prevention within a health equity and innovation framework can strengthen hearing conservation systems while advancing sustainable and socially just hearing health strategies.


Keywords

artificial intelligence; digital health; health equity; hearing conservation; occupational noise-induced hearing loss; tele-audiology; Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR); sub-Saharan Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 418
Total article views: 291


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.