Original Research

Student perspectives of simulated learning to improve their dysphagia management

Skye N. Adams, Kelly-Ann Kater, Jaishika Seedat
South African Journal of Communication Disorders | Vol 71, No 1 | a1060 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1060 | © 2024 Skye N. Adams, Kelly-Ann Kater, Jaishika Seedat | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 23 May 2024 | Published: 30 September 2024

About the author(s)

Skye N. Adams, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Kelly-Ann Kater, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Jaishika Seedat, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The use of simulation to enhance knowledge translation and bridge the theoretical-clinical gap to enhance clinical training and competency in health professions has received mixed reviews in the literature.

Objectives: This research examined student perspectives of a simulation laboratory in speech therapy to improve students’ clinical competency when working with adults with communication and dysphagia impairments.

Method: An exploratory descriptive pilot study was conducted in 2022 with 16 third-year speech-language therapy students. This mixed-methods study involved students completing purposefully developed pre-and post-surveys to explore their experiences with simulated teaching and learning and their perceptions of confidence. Data were analysed using an independent t-test. Following the surveys, the students participated in a focus group discussion about their simulation experience, and data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Student ratings of clinical skills improved from pre to post-simulation significantly overall and across six out of the eight items. The focus group revealed insights into students’ experiences, highlighting increased confidence, the benefits of making mistakes in a safe environment and improved preparedness to work with dysphagia in patients.

Conclusion: While simulation serves as a valuable tool in enhancing clinical skills and building confidence, it must be used as an adjunct to real-life exposure and not as a replacement.

Contribution: The integration of both simulated and real-life experiences is essential to provide a comprehensive and practical learning environment for students.


Keywords

simulation learning; clinical skills; soft skills; self-reflection; undergraduate education

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 172
Total article views: 133


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.